Simple Girl In A Complex Technological World

Archive for October 2008

“Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” George Bernard Shaw

Traditional journalists, you need a reality check: New media is running circles around traditional journalism and if you want to survive, you need to take some lessons from the not-so new kids on the block-Bloggers.

President of Advance Internet and independent blogger Jeff Jarvis agrees with my opinion and mentions in his blog, “BuzzMachine” this:

“It is our [journalists’] fault that we did not see the change coming soon enough and ready our craft for the transition. It is our fault that we did not see and exploit – hell, we resisted – all the opportunities new media and new relationships with the public presented.”

But there is hope for traditional journalists and journalism itself, take a lesson from the bloggers and begin to listen and engage the public in conversation, and while you’re at it, put a little personality into your writing. Opening up to the public may help to forge a stronger relationship and support greater loyalty by readers.

In another BuzzMachine blog by Jarvis, he mentions the concept of “networked journalism,” meaning both professionals and amateurs working together to get the facts and to make sure the real story is published, whether it be in print or online. As Jarvis says, “this isn’t about citizens or amateurs vs. professionals. We’re all in this together. Journalism is a collaborative venture. Journalism is a network.”

What it all comes down to is this: traditional media must embrace interactivity with the public if it wants to keep the audiences it has and to attract future generations. Traditional journalists must essentially throw tradition to the wind and not be afraid to go out and get closer to the people, rather than the elite and executive they may be reporting on.

So confession, I absolutely love the movie Back To The Future. The idea that someone can go back in time and change so much about what will happen in the future. Obviously real world science hasn’t come up with a time traveling Delorean but there is another way to go back in time… by way of online archives.

Going back via the online archives won’t let you change the future but it gives the chance to see what a site may have looked like in years past or look at the front page stories of the time. But what happens when a story is removed or not archived at all? If a story was printed, it exists until the paper it was printed in is destroyed but online, a few simple clicks and it never existed or a few edits and the facts are changed.

It is a bit eerie that publications have the power to make it seem that some stories never happened and it brings about thoughts of 1984 in that aspect but the fact is, this does really happen. Stories are removed everyday online whether it be because of public outcry or simply time to make room for newer stories. The question is, should online editors delete the past? My opinion is no because every article and piece of news history deserves to remain online or to be documented and moved to print so that future generations can look back on the news articles of our time (no matter how unimportant they may seem)

Back To The Online Archives

Back To The Online Archives


October 2008
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 322 hits